Thursday, November 27, 2025

Washington County OK’s budget: 16.97% tax hike; cutting 22 county jobs

By Ben Westcott , Chronicle Staff Writer

The Washington County Board of Supervisors approved a 2026 budget that increases the property tax levy by 16.97% and cuts 10 full-time and 12 part-time county jobs.

“I feel particularly horrible about this entire process,” said Board Chair Robert Henke (Argyle). “This has been a terrible sort of deal for everybody, and I certainly feel as strongly for employees as anybody, and invoking the retired people trying to stay in their house that are 75 years old — I know one, right here (himself). I’m still working a couple of jobs to keep it going, so I certainly feel on the taxpayer’s side as well. I don’t think I could vote for or against this budget and feel good.”

Friday’s Washington County Board of Supervisors meeting where the budget was passed was well attended. Chronicle photos /Ben Westcott
Brian Campbell, the Hebron Town Supervisor who is the Budget Officer, said, “There’s no winners. The only winner will be if next year we’re not in the same position. That’s why you have to work on it starting tomorrow. You have to try to keep things in line. There’s no way I wanted to lay off people. I had to come on strong; stronger than some people appreciated. But it’s kind of what you have to do to make some things happen sometimes to shake it up and figure out where the vacancies are, where things can happen, where the retirements will be. Everything came to light at the end.”

Only four supervisors voted no on the budget: Dana Hogan (Kingsbury), Scott Hahn (Hartford), Dan Shaw (Easton) and John Rozell (Whitehall).

Mr. Hogan told The Chronicle, “I think there’s more cuts that could be made.”

Prior to the budget vote, he brought forward a resolution to sunset health insurance coverage for county supervisors as of Dec. 31, 2026, so that incoming supervisors in 2027 would no longer be covered under the County Health Insurance Plan.

He said the move would save the county $4 million over 10 years.

“Would you like to have $4 million in your fund balance today?” he asked County Treasurer Al Nolette.

“Kill for it,” Mr. Nolette responded.

The motion ultimately failed in a close vote. Voting to eliminate health insurance for incoming supervisors were Mr. Hogan, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Shaw, Darrell Wilson (Putnam), Catherine Fedler (Cambridge), Charles Tall (Dresden) and James Nolan (Greenwich).

Some protested the budget’s job cuts.
Voting against the motion to eliminate the health insurance were Mr. Henke, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Rozell, Nathaniel Baker (Granville), Sam Hall (Fort Ann), Alen Wang (White Creek), David O’Brien (Hampton), Jay Skellie (Jackson), and Sue Clary (Salem).

“I’m still disappointed that we have health insurance paid for part-time supervisors,” Supervisor Hogan told The Chronicle afterwards. “We shouldn’t be doing that.” He said the supervisors who voted against his proposed resolution “ought to be ashamed of themselves.”

Putnam’s Mr. Wilson said of the budget overall, “Although I don’t like the percent increase, having been a part of this process, it’s where we finally got to. And we iterated this multiple times, we had a lot of involvement and feedback from the public. We reconsidered some actions and considered new ones based on that feedback. I think it’s the best compromise we have right now to all the competing interests that we’ve heard from the public over the past couple months,” he said.

Mr. Hahn objects to the job cuts. “All the positions at this county were approved by this board. They had a reason. And one thing that I don’t think has been taken into consideration when we talk about that is the services those positions provide. Many of them are mandated, many of them are partially funded. And I’m not going to support this budget with any layoffs.”

He advocated for further time to amend the budget proposal. “I look at it like we have another month to work on this,” he said. “And as long as people’s livelihood is on the line, I say we take that month.”

Mr. Shaw also voted no, telling The Chronicle after the meeting, “I believe there could have been more cuts. I believe the supervisors are not putting the taxpayers first.”

“And that’s why I’m leaving,” he added, noting that he chose not to run for re-election. “I don’t feel like I’m accomplishing anything anymore.”

During the meeting, another ‘no’ vote, Supervisor Rozell, said, “We have to keep an eye closer on the departments. Cut down on our spending. That’s got to be done so that we survive this next year.”

Copyright © 2025 Lone Oak Publishing Co., Inc. All Rights Reserved

Check Also

Locals handle Snoopy balloon, Macy’s parade

By Cathy DeDe, Chronicle Managing Editor While many of us are tuning into the 99th …